Sign in or 
Share this
Network Leadership
This page has been deleted by nataliallc.
To restore this page, please contact a site moderator.
nataliallc |
Latest page update: made by nataliallc
, Mar 21 2011, 3:28 PM EDT
(about this update
About This Update
Edited by nataliallc
No content added or deleted. - complete history) |
|
Keyword tags:
None
More Info: links to this page
|
| Started By | Thread Subject | Replies | Last Post | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| creinelt | Fostering Collaborative Organizations and Networks for Social Change | 4 | Jul 23 2010, 3:05 PM EDT by tutormentor | ||
|
Thread started: Jul 18 2010, 12:27 PM EDT
Watch
Thanks Kendra for posting. (I framed a question for your post...feel free to edit it if you like). I so agree with you about the importance of understanding collaborative leadership using a system framework. A systems perspective focuses attention on the dynamics of what is happening within and outside organizations. An interesting issue to focus on is how collaborative activity is occurring within bureaucratic organizations? I think Patti's post speaks to this issue as well when she talks about informal and formal networks. I think there is a really interesting question you raise: How much bureaucratic involvement dampens the effectiveness of collaborative activity and where is the threshold of top-down control that still enables collaborative activity to thrive? So much network leadership is practiced within and across organizations whose leadership operates with a bureaucratic mindset, and it's often experienced as a real challenge. How do we keep pushing the threshold so that collaboration has more space to develop within and across organizations?
|
||||
| creinelt | Networks and sustainability | 0 | Jun 15 2010, 9:14 AM EDT by creinelt | ||
|
|
Thread started: Jun 15 2010, 9:14 AM EDT
Watch
Thanks Beth for posting this piece on "why working through networked approaches is a core strategy for sustainability". The example you give of the Boston Green and Healthy Building Network makes a strong case for what can be achieved by investing in and working through networks. I really liked your comment that "one organization cannot become sustainable alone; it requires that the larger “ecosystems” it works within to transform as well." As I think about the challenges facing nonprofit organizations, your example helps me recognize that it will take a transformation in the whole nonprofit eco-system to really make "social" work sustainable. We need to do much more from envisioning to creating standards to creating business models that pull the system in new directions.
Do you find this valuable?
Keyword tags:
networks
susatinability
|
||||
| RossWirth42 | Lessons from Complexity Science | 0 | May 27 2010, 4:04 PM EDT by RossWirth42 | ||
|
Thread started: May 27 2010, 4:04 PM EDT
Watch
The content above mentions complexity (used in lay terms), self-organization, emergence, and other terminology from Complexity Science. As a further expansion of the focus of network leadership, might we expand the investigation specifically into the area of organizational complexity (complexity science applied to social groups)? Such a study identifies possible leadership practices and often provides an understanding of what has become accepted as Best Practice. For example:
• Use Simple Rules for alignment – Avoid complicated, inflexible rule structures • Direction emerges from Shared Vision – Focus on progress, not size of the gap – Vision continues to evolve collectively (no end) • Enable people to acquire skills & interact – All change is local – Master planning is less effective • Encourage many small tests – Nurture success (or quickly discard ) – Diffusion of knowledge through networking Also see http://www.entarga.com/symposium/Dec09-Complexity.pdf |
||||
| RossWirth42 | Leadership in contrasting network styles | 0 | May 27 2010, 3:46 PM EDT by RossWirth42 | ||
|
|
Thread started: May 27 2010, 3:46 PM EDT
Watch
Obama's Organizing for America is often cited as an example of the new power from that arises when people network. However, other network styles are also arising. For an expanded study of network leadership, how about investigating the leadership structure of Organizing for America with that of the Tea Party movement? I see very different approaches in how strategic direction is set and how alignment is accomplished.
|
||||
Showing 1 of 1 featured threads and the last 3 of 4 threads for this page
- view all
